Our Method

How We Review

Strong opinions are only worth reading if there’s a rigorous process behind them. Here’s ours — for the gear we recommend and the criticism we publish.

The one rule

Our verdict is never for sale. We earn commissions when you buy through some of our links (see our disclosure), and we take zero payment, gifts, or “sponsored” consideration from any manufacturer in exchange for coverage or a rating. If a $180 soundbar beats a $2,000 system, we say so — and we’ll happily link you to the cheaper one.

How we evaluate gear

The Gear desk starts from first principles, not spec sheets. For a display, that means the things that actually determine what you see — panel type and its real limitations, motion handling, out-of-the-box color accuracy, the settings that quietly sabotage the picture, and whether the premium tier buys you anything your eyes can detect. For audio, it means room reality over showroom claims, and a hard line on pseudoscience: if a difference can’t survive a level-matched comparison, it isn’t a difference.

How we form criticism

The Screen desk holds a simple standard: an opinion is only worth publishing if it’s argued, not just asserted. Being contrarian is easy; being right and interesting is the job. When we call a beloved film overrated or a maligned one great, we show the work — the scene, the choice, the reason — so you can disagree with something real.

The human check

Reelist uses AI-assisted drafting and research to work faster and cover more ground. But every piece is read, fact-checked, and approved by a human editor before it publishes. Claims are verified. Prices and specs are checked against primary sources at time of writing. Nothing ships on autopilot, and nothing ships that an editor wouldn’t put their own judgment behind.

Found something wrong?

Prices move, firmware changes, and we’re not infallible. If you spot an error, tell us and we’ll fix it and note the correction. Accuracy beats ego — see our ethics & corrections policy.